Skip to content
Preserve Wealth Group

United States · Case study

Reviewing the structure behind a substantial tax bill

A construction owner reviewed business structure, personal taxes and outstanding filings. The advisor reports $500,000 in tax savings.

Business revenue described
$4 million
Personal income described
$1.5 million
Tax savings reported
$500,000

Strong revenue had not produced a coordinated plan

A California construction owner approached Joshua Schlinsky with questions about his business structure and personal taxes. The submission describes approximately $4 million in business revenue and $1.5 million in personal income.

The owner had made money but, in the advisor's account, had not built the savings he wanted. He was also behind on filing some tax returns. His questions were practical: which planning strategies were available, and how did they fit within the tax code?

The need for a review therefore extended beyond the next tax payment. Business structure, personal filings and future savings all needed attention.

What the advisor describes reviewing

Joshua describes reviewing the relationship between the business arrangements and the owner's personal tax position. The submission names bonus depreciation, leveraged charitable giving and a “Structured Ownership Program” among the strategies involved.

Those labels are not enough to reproduce the recommendation. The source does not explain the ownership program, the charitable arrangement or the contribution of each component to the overall result. The article therefore describes the areas the advisor reports addressing without presenting those arrangements as instructions for another owner.

The account also describes attention to earlier tax years and a longer-term retirement plan. No specific retirement-policy terms or final retirement values are supplied.

What was reported

Joshua reports $500,000 in tax savings and recovery of close to half of taxes paid across 2023–2025. The submission does not provide the returns or exact recovery amounts, or establish whether the recovery figure overlaps with the reported $500,000. These figures should not be added together.

According to the advisor, the client proceeded after understanding the available strategies and the proposed business and personal structure. The submission also mentions audit support as part of the discussion. That should not be presented as a guarantee that a tax position will be accepted.

A useful starting point for another owner

This account illustrates the questions a business owner can bring to an initial review: which returns remain outstanding, how income reaches the owner personally, what planning is already in place, and what documentation supports a proposed change.

The reported result belongs to this advisor's account of this client. The next step for another construction owner is an assessment of their own facts and records.

Share your business situation and tax range so PWG can review a suitable introduction.

Find your specialist ↗
Joshua Schlinsky
Joshua Schlinsky
Safe Secure Financial
California · Preserve Wealth Group network

This case study describes one client’s circumstances and is provided for information only. Individual results vary and are not typical. Projected figures are illustrations based on the advisor’s own case design rather than booked results, and are neither a quote nor a projection of your outcome. Preserve Wealth Group is a referral and marketing platform, not a licensed financial, tax, or legal advisor. Independent licensed professionals implement every strategy described. No client identifying information has been disclosed.

Your next step

Find the specialist
for your situation.

Answer a few questions so we can review your needs and identify a suitable professional.

See if you qualify

No cost to request an introduction.

Find your specialist